Published: 6/1/13

This article discusses the problem of hold-up that is not the consequence of deception of a standard setting organization by a SEP holder, and whether this type of hold-up is reachable by Section 2 of the Sherman Act.  The article shows that the reach of Section 2 is not dependent on a requirement that the SEP holder commit fraud or deception at the time of a standard’s development.   Instead, in the absence of fraud or deception, Section 2 would still apply where the SEP holder’s breach of its FRAND commitment enabled it to exploit market power that it had agreed to forego by making the FRAND commitment.

Read More