About allthingsfrand

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far allthingsfrand has created 569 blog entries.
13th Jan,15

Case AT.39985

2017-05-22T19:17:55+00:00By |

Published: 1/13/15In this decision, the European Commission determined that Motorola Mobility abused its dominant position under European competition law by seeking and enforcing an injunction against Apple for infringing a FRAND-encumbered SEPs.  The Commission explained that FRAND commitments are designed to ensure effective access to a standard for all market [...]

13th Jan,15

Motorola Mobility and Samsung Electronics – Frequently asked questions

2017-05-22T19:17:55+00:00By |

Published: 1/13/15Publication: European CommissionIn announcing enforcement actions involving the invocation of injunctive relief by two holders of FRAND-encumbered SEPs, the European Commission stated that “it is anti-competitive to use injunctions in relation to SEPs in the following circumstances:  when in a standardisation context, a SEP holder has committed to license [...]

13th Jan,15

SEP Enforcement Disputes Beyond the Water’s Edge: A Survey of Recent Non-U.S. Decisions

2017-05-22T19:17:55+00:00By |

Published: 1/13/15This article contains a useful survey of FRAND decisions outside the United States as of mid-2013.  The article notes:  "With some exceptions, courts worldwide have been robustly enforcing FRAND and disclosure commitments in disputes regarding SEPs to ensure the integrity of the standard setting process and to protect against [...]

13th Jan,15

Standard Essential Patent Disputes and Antitrust Law

2017-05-22T19:17:55+00:00By |

Published: 1/13/15In this statement, the FTC explained the potential of FRAND abuse to facilitate hold-up of standard implementers.  The Commission stated that “incorporating patented technologies into standards also has the potential to distort competition by enabling SEP holders to use the leverage that they may acquire as a result of [...]

2nd Dec,14

Ericsson Inc. v. D-Link Systems

2017-05-23T03:49:39+00:00By |

Published: 12/2/14 In this decision, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reviewed a trial court’s decision upholding a jury award of $0.15 for three Wi-Fi SEPs.   The Court of Appeals held that the trial court had not instructed the jury properly and reversed the damages award. In particular, [...]

Load More Posts